Subscribe to Our Newsletter

This Google™ translation feature is provided for informational purposes only.
The Office of the Attorney General is unable to guarantee the accuracy of this translation and is therefore not liable for any inaccurate information resulting from the translation application tool.
Please consult with a translator for accuracy if you are relying on the translation or are using this site for official business.
If you have any questions please contact: Bilingual Services Program at EERROffice@doj.ca.gov
A copy of this disclaimer can also be found on our Disclaimer page.
The “Pink Tax” is illegal in California; gender-based price differences for substantially similar consumer products violate California law, including AB 1287. Because the Attorney General has enforcement authority for violations of California’s Pink Tax Law, it is critical that we hear from the public about potential violations of the law.
When items marketed to women or girls are priced higher than the same or substantially similar items marketed to men or boys, the price difference that women have to pay is called the Pink Tax.
Women make up as much as 85% of consumer purchases in the United States — they also often face higher prices for seemingly neutral products. Unequal pricing translates into unjust and harmful financial impacts for women, girls, and their families.
AB 1287, California’s Pink Tax Law, codified at Civil Code section 51.14, prohibits charging different prices for goods that are substantially similar but are priced differently based on the gender of the product’s target audience, with products marketed to women or girls typically having higher prices.
In passing AB 1287, the Legislature cited considerable evidence of the existence of the Pink Tax, including a 2015 study showing that girls’ or women’s products cost more than similar products for boys or men 42% of the time. On average, the study found, women’s products cost 7% more and as much as 13% more for personal care products. 1
Some examples of the types of consumer products where gender-based differential pricing may be found include:
The law does not prohibit charging different prices for substantially similar goods for gender-neutral reasons. AB 1287 identifies five specific examples of gender-neutral reasons:
In addition to the above, AB 1287 also allows for any other gender-neutral reason for charging a different price for those goods.
Because the Attorney General has enforcement authority for violations of the “Pink Tax” law, it is critical that we hear from the public about potential violations of the law. If you have seen or been a victim of gender-based price differences that you believe violate the law, please file a complaint here.